Needs Boolean criteria

Google and StartPage handle AND, OR, NOT (-), and EXACTLY (""). These are a sine qua non for efficient searching, but I can find no indication that Brave does.

Hey @cem ! Welcome to the community :smiley:

We can make this thread a feature request :wink:

Porridge

If that means you will enable Boolean Search, then YES, DO IT.

If I cannot search for exact strings e.g. “exact strings” or exclude sites e.g. fakebook, abc, nbc, msnbc, fox, nytimes, et al then I may as well let google spy on me.

Is there any movement on this? So far Brave Search is the best non-tracking search engine I’ve found, but the fact that I can’t precisely control my search results is a huge downside, and keeps me from recommending it to others. Would love to hear this will be a feature soon!

Over a year since we heard from @Support @GreenBananaPorridge so I guess holding your breath is NOT a good idea. :frowning_face: :frowning_face: :frowning_face: :frowning_face:

I seriously cannot believe users aren’t screaming for this functionality. I keep searching for “Brave search modifiers” (~once per month) and can’t find anything… Surely I’m simply overlooking it.? There are ZERO search modifiers in Brave? I thought it was built on Chromium and therefore would have the same search modifiers as Chrome.? I guess not…

@apwkdtb - With you, that makes a total of four people that want this. Ming boggling isn’t it?

+1 padding padding padding

Just set up a brave account to inquire about this. I also think it would be coo if dorks or boolean worked. :innocent:


cyberpunk-NOT-2077-Brave-Search

Yep, definitely need boolean. It is a necessity. Also only created account to request this

Crickets… Chirp… Chirp…Chirp…

@GreenBananaPorridge

WAY back in the day, Google became my primary search engine precisely because of the presence of boolean search operators. It was the only way to eliminate the cruft that otherwise litters search results, making it impossible to find what you’re looking for.,

It’s been more than a decade and half since that feature was present in Chrome. The quotation-marks operator for “required” helps a bit, but not enough.

I presume that the feature is just inordinately difficult to implement, or to maintain.
It’s possible that liability issues are involved.

In any case, that feature is still needed for searches today, even with the help of AI .
The options I see:

  1. Give AI the tools apply logical operators to filter search results.
  2. Bring back those operators
  3. If necessary, create a special page for for search-operators and add a liability-clause!

@ericMB not sure what you, @UMMD, and everyone else here is missing. They have the search operators to do exactly what people want. https://search.brave.com/help/operators

I know back in 2022/2023 it was still being worked on. It should work fine now overall. If it applies search operators, it will show the message disclaiming it’s being used as you can see in the screenshot below. And if there isn’t enough criteria when it uses them, then it also will show a message explaining that.